Empoword

Part Three: Research and Argumentation 316 C urrency How recently was the text created? Does that impact the accuracy or value of its contents, either positively or negatively? Generally, a text that is current is more credible and useful: data will be more accurate, the content will reflect more up-to-date ideas, and so on. However, there are some exceptions. • A text that is not current might be useful because it reflects attitudes of its publication era. For instance, if I were writing a paper on sexism in the office environment, it might be convincing to include a memo on dress codes from 1973. • A text that is current might not be useful because the phenomena it discusses might not have existed long enough to have substantial evidence or study. For instance, if I were writing a paper on nanorobotics, it would be difficult to evaluate long-term impacts of this emergent technology because it simply hasn’t been around long enough. R elevance Is the text closely related to your topic? Does it illuminate your topic, or is it only tangentially connected? A text that is relevant is generally more useful, as you probably already realize. Exceptions to this might include: • A text that is too relevant might not be useful because it might create overlap or redundancy in your argument. You should use texts like this to pivot, complicate, or challenge your topic so you are not just repeating someone else’s ideas. • A text that is only slightly relevant might be useful in providing background knowledge, drawing out an analogy, or gesturing to important questions or ideas you don’t have room to discuss in the scope of your paper. A ccuracy Is there any reason to doubt the validity of the text? Is it possible that the information and ideas included are simply untrue?