Community Resilience to Climate Change: Theory, Research and Practice

113 Table 4. Five lowest rated indicators. Figure 3 displays boxplots of all indicators. The main tendency has already been shown in a more condensed form previously in Figure 2. Share of nature conservation and protection areas (A_c_1) was the lowest ranking in the dimension environment. The second indicator of the action field biodiversity, however, received high approval, which emphasised the perceived importance of biodiversity considerations for climate resilience in the urban context. Settlement structure (B_a_1&2) was seen as vital for structural climate change adaptation, similar to the first action fields of soil and green spaces (A_a_1-3). Figure 3. Box-plots of all indicators included in the survey (see Table 2 for indicator codes). Energy (B_b_1&2) indicators, in contrast, not only ranged from a rating of one to five, but the quartiles of the boxplot also show a comparably high range around the middle of the scale. 3.2. General Workshop Results Regarding the MIS The discussion of the indicators during two discussion groups yielded important feedback on the overarching attributes and requirements of the MIS. They were mentioned several times from different persons and related to different indicators. Firstly, one important aspect