Introduction to Mathematical Analysis I - 3rd Edition

24 1.5 The Completeness Axiom for the Real Numbers ■ Example 1.5.1 (a) sup[0,3) =sup[0,3] =3. First consider the set [0,3] ={x ∈R: 0≤x ≤3}. We will show that 3 satisfies conditions (1) and (2) in the definition of supremum. By the definition of the given set, we see that for all x ∈[0,3], x ≤3. Thus 3 is an upper bound. This verifies condition (1). To verify condition (2) suppose that M is an upper bound of [0,3]. Since 3 ∈[0,3], we get 3 ≤M. Therefore condition (2) holds. It follows that 3 is indeed the supremum of [0,3]. Consider next the set [0,3) ={x∈R: 0≤x<3}. We again verify that 3 satisfies conditions (1) and (2) in the definition of supremum. Condition (1) follows as before since 3 is an upper bound of [0,3). For condition (2), because 3 is not in the set we cannot proceed as before. Suppose that Mis an upper bound of [0,3) and assume, by way of contradiction, that 3>M. Since Mis an upper bound of [0,3), we have that M>0. Set x=M+3 2 . Then 0<M= M+M 2 < M+3 2 < 3+3 2 =3 or M<x <3. This is a contradiction since Mis an upper bound of [0,3) and x ∈[0,3). We conclude that 3≤Mand, hence, 3 is the supremum of [0,3). (b) sup{3,5,7,8,10}=10. Clearly 10 is an upper bound of the set. Moreover, any upper boundMmust satisfy 10≤Mas 10 is an element of the set. Thus 10 is the supremum. (c) sup (−1)n n : n∈N = 1 2 . Note that if n∈Nis even, then n≥2 and (−1)n n = 1 n ≤ 1 2 . If n∈Nis odd, then (−1)n n =− 1 n <0< 1 2 . This shows that (−1)n/n≤1 2 for all n∈N. Hence 1/2 an upper bound of the set. Also 1/2 is an element of the set, it follows as in the previous example that 1/2 is the supremum. (d) sup{x2 : −2<x <1, x ∈R}=4. Set A={x2 : −2 <x <1, x ∈R}. If y ∈A, then y =x2 for some x ∈(−2,1) and, hence, |x| <2. Therefore, y =x2 =|x|2 <4. Thus, 4 is an upper bound of A. Suppose Mis an upper bound of Abut M<4. Choose a number y ∈Rsuch that M<y <4 and 0<y. Set x =− √y. Then−2<x <0<1 and, so, y =x2 ∈A. However, y >Mwhich contradicts the fact that Mis an upper bound. Thus 4≤M. This proves that 4=supA. Remark 1.5.1 Let Abe a nonempty subset of R. If there is an element aM∈Asuch that aM≥x for all x ∈A, we say that aM is the maximum of Aand write aM=maxA. If there is an element am∈A such that am≤x for all x ∈A, we say that am is the minimum of Aand write am=minA. It is clear that if Ahas a maximum element then it is bounded above since maxAis an upper bound. Also, if an upper bound belongs to the set then it is the maximum of the set.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NTc4NTAz